The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Research the applicable program guidelines
|
|
Policy and program information required to participate in the assessment of projects within a region or State/Territory is obtained and reviewed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Own role and responsibilities are identified within applicable program guidelines and legislative requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Own knowledge of policy and program information and legislative requirements is built through involvement in development activities to achieve an understanding of the program aims and goals. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Changes in policy and program information are identified for impact on assessment processes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review the submissions
|
|
Project submissions are reviewed prior to the assessment committee meeting in the context of policy and program information. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Personal review and ranking of projects is completed in preparation for the assessment committee meeting, in accordance with program guidelines. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Participate in committee assessment process
|
|
Projects which meet program guidelines are identified by the committee for further assessment. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Submissions seeking further funding for existing projects are identified and reviewed under separate criteria according to program guidelines. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assessments of projects, which have been processed through a local or regional assessment panel, are given a balanced consideration to manage the time taken on the assessment, and to ensure equity and fairness in the process. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Projects are reviewed and ranked by the committee in terms of the priorities and other factors defined in the program guidelines. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Active listening approaches and appropriate questioning techniques are used to develop an understanding and a team approach across a diverse committee/panel. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Projects are selected for recommendation in accordance with program guidelines and available funds. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Maintain probity of assessment
|
|
Confidentiality requirements of the assessment process are maintained. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Ethical and legislative standards and procedures of the assessment process are followed. Completed |
Evidence:
|